Tuesday, September 26, 2006

Latin America and the Devil

On Wednesday September 20, 2006, Hugo Chavez addressed the General Assembly of the United Nations. In his address, he verbally attacked the United States and lashed out at George Bush. At one point in the speech he said, “the devil came here yesterday. Yesterday the devil came here. Right here. [crosses himself] And it smells of sulfur still today.” He was of course referring to George W. Bush.
Chavez also criticized Bush’s statement referring to extremism. He said, “The president of the United States, yesterday, said to us, right here, in this room, and I'm quoting, ‘Anywhere you look, you hear extremists telling you can escape from poverty and recover your dignity through violence, terror and martyrdom.’ Wherever he looks, he sees extremists. And you, my brother - he looks at your color, and he says, oh, there's an extremist. Evo Morales, the worthy president of Bolivia, looks like an extremist to him. The imperialists see extremists everywhere. It's not that we are extremists. It's that the world is waking up. It's waking up all over. And people are standing up.”
Chavez went on to criticize the “undemocratic” structure at the UN, stating that the United States and their partners had tremendous amount of disproportionate power in the Security Council that created an atmosphere of illegitimacy.

Soon after Chavez’s heated speech, none other than Democratic House Members, Charles Rangel and Nancy Pelosi criticized Chavez for this comments. Rangel stated, “You don't come into my country; you don't come into my congressional district and you don't condemn my president.” Nancy Pelosi stated, “He is an everyday thug”.

This comments in particular Rangel’s comments, drive me crazy. How can he make that statement with a straight face? I contend that any person/country that has been a victim of U.S. imperialistic ambitions should be able to speak and criticize the policies that keep his region of the world in a vicious downward spiral. On the contrary, I applaud Mr. Chavez for having the courage take to make such comments. One would only hope that other Latin American Leaders were bold as is Mr. Chavez.

I personally see him as carrying the torch of all Latin American Countries that seek self determinism without having their overgrown, powerful neighbor always looking down on them.

With the U.S.’s past involvement in trying to destabilize Latin America, be it the coup against the Allende Government in Chile or the illegal funding of the Contras in Nicaragua, I think that Rangel like Pelosi, should not be criticizing in ignorance or dare I say arrogance.


http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092106P.shtml

Monday, September 18, 2006

The Question

A cousin once asked me, “What is Political Science?” He was inquiring as to why I choose Political Science as a major. To my dismay, I could not provide him with a clear answer.

I’m sure that I am not alone in that when I think about PS, I immediately begin thinking about Democrats and Republicans, about the Presidency and Congress.

The things that first come to mind are correct in the sense that PS does include the different parties and of course, the different branches of government but thinking in this manner is simplistic.

As I sit here and ponder what PS is, I can’t help but think about power and how PS is the vehicle to exercising such power. One thing is certain, PS or politics influences all of our lives. Whether it’s a national policy that is being implemented or the common office politics, one is sure to have encountered PS in one form or another.

Maybe after researching and writing a paper on what PS is I will be able to better articulate what it is and why I enjoy it so much.